Nothing new here. Feel free to move along.
I got to thinking recently (and not for the first time) about the smoking ban in the UK.
This was prompted by something I’d heard on that curate’s egg of a radio station, BBC Radio 4.
The programme in question reported that in spite of what is often thought of as a European-wide, EU-derived ban on smoking in public places, it is still OK to smoke in public in Belgium. Oh the irony of being able to spark up in a bar just around the corner from the EU parliament.
The same item went on to describe how the owners of two bars in Berlin had gone to court to attempt to over-turn the smoking ban on the grounds it had damaged their business.
They won!
They now have the legal right to have a separate smoking room in their bars – with the proviso that no food may be served there.
This seems like a welcome outbreak of common sense to me. I wonder if we’ll see the same thing in the UK. Somehow I doubt it.
At various times in my life I have been a smoker and a non-smoker. I’ve never felt that I needed government intervention where that choice was concerned. Like the overwhelming majority of people who have smoked in this country, I knew the ins and outs of the health implications before I chose to start.
I think it’s a very good idea for separate spaces in pubs and bars for those who wish to smoke and those who do not. Then people can make choices. By and large, most people are capable of making choices.
But where the UK smoking ban and I really fall out was the requirement for all buildings members of the public may occasionally enter to display the same no smoking sign. Just to remind us that the law that had banned smoking in public buildings in the UK applied to public buildings in the UK.
Never before had I wished I owned a business that printed signs, but the government spent millions of taxpayers’ money printing these ridiculous signs and one can only assume that someone somewhere with a sign making business did very well out of it.
What next though? If we need a sign on every public building to say smoking is against the law, how about one that says breaking & entering is against the law? You know, for the avoidance of any doubt – just in case potential burglars might need reminding.
Then we could all get a t-shirt printed that has something written on it like “NO MURDERING – killing people, such as the wearer of this garment, is against the law.”
Sound absurd? No more so though, surely, than the epidemic of no smoking signs.
2 comments:
You, my son, are a genius.
This is the blog post I wished I had written.
I too remember the sackloads of snail mail paper press releases (and don't forget the reams upon reams of curly faxes)which flooded newspaper offices every day.
You never once would have dreamt of "naming and shaming" the senders.
It's not as if "unsolicited" always equates with "bad".
Any journalist (or blogger) worth their salt will know that the best material can come from the unlikeliest places.
The people who AREN'T whingeing about press releases are the genuine pros, who just get on with it.
Rather than whining, they develop a heightened story sense, adopt a more broad-minded approach to what constitutes "interesting" - and also acquire a more ruthless and efficient filtering system.
Thanks Scott - you posted your comment under my blog about no smoking signs.
I'll attempt to move it. But I'm no techie!
Post a Comment