![]() |
| January-June 2012 - Sean Fleming's "don't run with scissors" wordcloud |
The most stationary of all stationery items, scissors hate to be hurried. I learned this as a child. You did too, probably. Don't run with scissors. A clear and simple instruction. Pencils, glue, staples... no problem. For them, like us, it's a finite existence. Time is short so don't dilly dally. But don't run with scissors.
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
january-june 2012 - six months as a wordcloud
Last year I created wordclouds at the end of each month. I've stopped doing it each month as it felt like it was becoming a bit of a *thing*. But I find them interesting to look back on, so I've created one that covers the first half of 2012.
Labels:
2012,
themes,
word cloud,
wordle
Saturday, 28 July 2012
why the uk health service is not america's concern
Following the opening ceremony of the 2012
Olympics, the world’s media was awash with reaction and opinion. Not all of it
glowing. A fair few overseas commentators seemed to find the NHS section of the
evening somewhat troubling.
For those that don’t know, the NHS is our
National Health Service, set up in the wake of WWII, state-owned and funded by
taxes.
Many US Republicans (and some Democrats
too) point at our NHS when arguing against many of President Obama’s planned
health reforms. A lot of what I read today was woefully inaccurate at best, and
rantingly offensive at worst.
Our health service *is* free at the point
of delivery. There is no ‘gaming’ it. We do have a private health sector, which
is thriving. So, if you have the money you can choose to pay rather than use
the NHS. You get treated by the same doctors, sometimes in the same hospitals.
But you get treated sooner.
All emergency treatment is via the NHS –
from heart attacks through to car accidents, shootings, stabbings etc.
The use by people in the US of the term
“socialized” health care means nothing to us. That simply is not what it is,
not what it feels like. It is a
hollow ideologue’s term to defend their distaste for providing health care for
all members of society.
It is my belief that the true test of a
society is how it regards the less fortunate and those in need of help. But I
keep that opinion to myself. I would never stoop so low as to lecture people in
the US, for example, on what their health system lacks – because I don’t live
there.
The UK’s NHS is far from perfect. The
waiting lists are too long. There is too much emphasis on measuring the wrong
aspects of patient treatment and not enough on actual patient care. Some
hospital governing bodies (it’s done regionally) have run out of money. The
quality of care you get is often due to how much the people you are treated by
actually care about what they are doing.
My father died in early 2011 and was
treated very badly in hospital during the last week of his life. My mother’s
cancer wasn’t diagnosed, despite many warning signs, until it had advanced to
the point where it was declared inoperable. My oldest son was left with a
ruptured appendix for almost two weeks before one particular doctor realised what
was going on – he dodged a one-in-a-thousand bullet.
Most people in the UK know someone that’s
had a bad experience at the hands of the NHS.
Most of us also know someone who received
life-saving treatment, or life-changing care at the hands of the NHS.
It’s always fascinating to read what people
overseas think of our country. But, mostly, you are all speaking from positions
of varying ignorance. The opinions I value most are from those who caveat their
comments by declaring themselves onlookers, not behaving like experts.
Tuesday, 24 July 2012
what the olympic sponsors could learn from beckham and adidas
Adidas pulled off a fantastic PR stunt yesterday at
the Westfield Stratford shopping centre (that’s ‘mall’ to my colonial friends).
They installed a photobooth and encouraged
people to step inside, whereupon… from the O to the M to golden-balls G –
there’s David Beckham waiting for them.
Brilliant work. Inspired. You want warm and
fuzzy brand association – there you are. You want to be seen as well connected
– help yourself. You want people to think your brand is cool – you got it.
So how come the other big
ticket sponsor brands haven't also done something interesting, different, entertaining..?
Don’t get me wrong, I am not for one minute
suggesting that anyone in their right mind would want to see Ronald McDonald
emerging from the darkness and coming toward them, least of all while they’re
in a confined space.
Yet, unless I’ve missed something, there
appears to be a dearth of other Olympi-brands dusting off their creative mojos
and winning the hearts and minds of the public.
There’s really no excuse in 2012 – it would
be as cheap as chips (which you can only buy from McDonalds, unless they are
served with fish as part of an authentic fish ‘n’ chips experience) to knock out a whole
rash of Facebook competitions and games, or do some cool London stuff via Foursquare,
maybe linked to previous London Olympics. Plus all the big brands have so much corporate sponsorship going on that they have more than enough potential strings to pull for a spot of A-list celebrity endorsement action.
Something. Anything. Anyone..?
It really wouldn’t be hard for these big
brands to create campaigns or one-off stunts that demonstrate they’ve actually
been listening to their customers through all the Facebook groups etc they have.
It makes me wonder what the point of it all is
(having a brand presence on Facebook, I mean) if you can’t then take everything
you’ve learned about interacting with your customers via a meaningful two-way
dialogue and put it to good use throughout all your PR, advertising, marketing
and comms activities.
I think that might be worth setting aside for another post.
Footnote: list of the London 2012 Olympic sponsors, partners and supporters here.
Labels:
adidas,
beckham,
brand,
facebook,
olympics,
social media,
sponsorship
Friday, 13 July 2012
o2 and the social media handbrake turn
Did O2 get it right on twitter in the wake of their network outage problems?
No.
And yes.
This may be one of the biggest clichés in
PR and comms, but it gets to the heart of a very important consideration – what are you trying to achieve, and what
does success look like?
When I and thousands of other O2 users
found we couldn’t make calls or send texts, we turned to twitter to see what
else we could learn about the problem… was it happening to anyone else, was
there an explanation, and so on. The O2 support page seemed to go offline
around the same time, possibly due to being swamped by enquiries.
Twitter was soon a-buzz with tweets from
disgruntled O2 customers.
There wasn’t a great deal of information
coming out of O2 and the grumbles began to grow in volume and intensity. The O2
twitter account seemed to go a bit quiet at that point too.
By Thursday, O2 seemed to be more in
control of itself, if not of the glitch that had caused the outage, and the
company’s twitter stream was soon alive with responses to customers.
O2 is one of the few brands I follow and
interact with on twitter. Not just because I’m a customer, although that is
ultimately the explanation, but also because I’ve always thought they got the
balance of interaction and broadcast right. There was a human touch to the O2
account but it never overpowered the O2 brand.
But in my opinion the wheels came off on
Thursday.
If you check out Karen Webber’s excellent piece about the outage on NewsReach you’ll see what is probably the most famous
tweet from O2 in response to an abusive customer’s tweet. It was inspired.
Genuinely funny.
That whoever was staffing
the twitter account was given the freedom to do that is a masterstoke.
However, I also got the impression that the
huge positive sentiment that tweet elicited from the wider audience prompted
someone at O2 to declare “do more tweets like that, I think we’ve
found our way out.”
For a while it seemed that O2’s motivation
on twitter was no longer to inform or engage with customers, but to demonstrate
how achingly funny the brand could be – how irreverent and not-at-all-how-you-expected it
was capable of being.
For me, that joke wore thin pretty
quickly.
It was clever though.
Social media is a fickle environment. The
speed with which people get enthused and subsequently bored is staggering at
times. So, why not take advantage of that..? Which is what O2 did.
By engaging in a spot of banter,
attempting to shock us all a little by responding to remarks about anal sex
with people’s mothers for example, the brand was executing the perfect social
media handbrake turn.
O2 outage..? What O2 outage..?? Look over here -
they’re being funny about tweeting first and fellating in hell later, and
joining in with jokes about pigeons.
Did O2 get it right? I think that depends
entirely on what we think they were trying to achieve. If it was reassuring
customers (and don’t forget some of them rely on O2 for their business) that
the problem had been identified and was being put right, I don’t think so. If
it was turning the tide of negative tweets, then yes.
They could have posted some animated cat
gifs, that would probably have had the same effect in terms of getting the
angry mob to put down the pitchforks and torches.
Personally, I think there was too much
emphasis on trying to be clever and funny, and not enough on acknowledging the
problem.
Footnote: can you see sour grapes
here? If you feel like trawling through my twitter stream you’ll find a tweet
from me to O2 stating that despite being inconvenienced by the outage, I wasn’t
feeling at all aggrieved. There are no sour grapes.
Background reading: BBC: "O2 says mobile network fully restored after fault."
Saturday, 7 July 2012
a torch, a procession and a glimmer of excitement
If you follow me on twitter you may have seen me occasionally expressing disappointment in the way certain aspects of the London Olympics are being handled.
Mostly, I find it distasteful that the corporate sponsors of the event have such a stranglehold on things. From the removal of beverages that aren't owned by Coca-Cola from swathes of London while the games take place, to the last minute decision to re-route the torch procession to avoid St James's Park (the football ground in Newcastle upon Tyne) because there were advertising boards bearing the names and logos of businesses that weren't official Olympic sponsors.
There are restrictions in place regarding non-sponsors being able to advertise on billboards during the games that mean LOCOG (the committee in charge of organising the London games) has had to buy up loads of advertising space in order to control what appears. I have no idea how much that has cost, nor how that is funded, but surely even the most ardent fan of the Olympics can't possibly think that is a right and proper way for things to be done.
The torch itself doesn't exactly sit well with me either.
When did the torch first become part of the Olympic paraphernalia...?
At the Berlin games of 1936. Yes, that's right the year Hitler tried to use the Olympics as a massive Nazi propaganda vehicle. The torch fitted in with the love of ceremony the Third Reich's architects had.
I remember the Olympics as an exciting sporting spectacle that had us all glued to our TVs when I was a boy. Sporting excellence was all that seemed to matter. It doesn't feel like that any more.
Athletes are no longer the plucky amateurs they once were, either. And is it me, or are police officers starting to look younger these days..?
The sight of the Olympic torch being borne around the UK (and, bizarrely, Ireland too - it's a different country) by a cross section of the population, or wounded service personnel, or ordinary people who have done extraordinary things, is one thing. But when celebrities started getting involved, the whole thing started to look like a circus.
In a couple of days' time, the Olympic torch passes close to my house. My youngest son, having been learning about the Olympics at school recently, is very excited and wants to see it.
So I'll take him.
And I'll hope that some of the wonder and excitement rubs off on me too. Because, for all that I think the excesses of commercialisation have tainted the Olympics, well... it's still the Olympics, right?
Mostly, I find it distasteful that the corporate sponsors of the event have such a stranglehold on things. From the removal of beverages that aren't owned by Coca-Cola from swathes of London while the games take place, to the last minute decision to re-route the torch procession to avoid St James's Park (the football ground in Newcastle upon Tyne) because there were advertising boards bearing the names and logos of businesses that weren't official Olympic sponsors.
There are restrictions in place regarding non-sponsors being able to advertise on billboards during the games that mean LOCOG (the committee in charge of organising the London games) has had to buy up loads of advertising space in order to control what appears. I have no idea how much that has cost, nor how that is funded, but surely even the most ardent fan of the Olympics can't possibly think that is a right and proper way for things to be done.
The torch itself doesn't exactly sit well with me either.
When did the torch first become part of the Olympic paraphernalia...?
At the Berlin games of 1936. Yes, that's right the year Hitler tried to use the Olympics as a massive Nazi propaganda vehicle. The torch fitted in with the love of ceremony the Third Reich's architects had.
I remember the Olympics as an exciting sporting spectacle that had us all glued to our TVs when I was a boy. Sporting excellence was all that seemed to matter. It doesn't feel like that any more.
Athletes are no longer the plucky amateurs they once were, either. And is it me, or are police officers starting to look younger these days..?
The sight of the Olympic torch being borne around the UK (and, bizarrely, Ireland too - it's a different country) by a cross section of the population, or wounded service personnel, or ordinary people who have done extraordinary things, is one thing. But when celebrities started getting involved, the whole thing started to look like a circus.
In a couple of days' time, the Olympic torch passes close to my house. My youngest son, having been learning about the Olympics at school recently, is very excited and wants to see it.
So I'll take him.
And I'll hope that some of the wonder and excitement rubs off on me too. Because, for all that I think the excesses of commercialisation have tainted the Olympics, well... it's still the Olympics, right?
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
is there a glitch..?
The right hand panel of this blog keeps disappearing - the search field, the "about me" bit, the archive, etc.
It *should* be there.
But it isn't.
Apologies. I'm sure, if you've noticed, it hasn't really bothered you.
I'll try and figure out what has gone wrong when I have a bit of time to focus on it.
Footnote: There was a glitch. It seems ok now.
It *should* be there.
But it isn't.
Apologies. I'm sure, if you've noticed, it hasn't really bothered you.
I'll try and figure out what has gone wrong when I have a bit of time to focus on it.
Footnote: There was a glitch. It seems ok now.
Sunday, 10 June 2012
bigots, banter and middle class banality
It’s not easy
being white, middle class, well educated and English. Or so I gather. I’m some
of those things, not all of them. So I speak (or write) from the vantage point
of the partial outsider. If such a beast exists.
This is a group of
people that have been denied so many of life’s little pleasures – in
particular, public displays of arrogance, superiority and bigotry. These things
simply aren’t cool anymore.
They can’t even
get away with being bigoted toward the less well off or the working class
anymore. It’s frowned upon.
Don’t go thinking
their fetid snobbishness has died off though. It’s the getting found out that’s
frowned upon. Being clumsy enough to give the game away is not cool. And so the
bigot just reinvented itself – well, slightly.
Want to see it in
action? Check out the I hate banter
brigade. On one hand this is a great example of how some people on twitter
really need a few actual problems in their lives in order to gain some
perspective. But on the other, it’s a plain as they come down-the-nose sneer at
the working class.
The kinds of
conversational dynamic that get labeled as banter
are really no different to badinage,
or witty repartee. Except even I know
you’re unlikely to hear “it’s just a bit of badinage” offered as an excuse from
someone who doesn’t have three or four A levels, a 2:1 from a red brick, and
who has a job rather than a career.
When I hear (or
read) “I hate banter” it translates as I
hate people who aren’t like me, who aren’t as clever as me, who don’t share my
sensibilities.
No one’s perfect
though, least of all me. I hate bigots and snobs – I’m only human. I especially
have a problem the ones that are not as funny or as clever as they think, but
do have a superiority complex than tends a little toward clinical narcissism.
I wonder sometimes
if part of the problem is simply that WMCWEEs (that’s white, middle class, well
educated and English) can’t be racist anymore. Unless they’re talking about
Americans, of course. For some reason I haven’t been able to figure out,
despite several years of thinking about it, it’s still OK to tell racist jokes
about Americans – mostly about them being fat or stupid.
I’ve heard middle
class English whities with degrees from hard-to-get-into universities make remarks about
Americans that simply would not be tolerated in public if the word “black” was
used rather than the word “American.” The extent of their denial when their
racism is pointed out to them is the only thing more astounding, in fact.
It’s the same with
the French. Being rude about the French is a commonplace activity. But again,
isn’t it tantamount to racism?
I think what I’m
getting at here is displacement. Those people savvy enough to realise they have
to cloak their bigotry will do just that and will find other targets and use other
weapons.
I don’t have any
answers. This is, really, little more than my using 500+ words to say “I hate
smug middle class wankers.”
Footnote: I dislike anonymous commenters. If you can't be adult enough to put your name to a comment, don't bother. I'll only delete it.
Footnote: I dislike anonymous commenters. If you can't be adult enough to put your name to a comment, don't bother. I'll only delete it.
Thursday, 3 May 2012
isabella joice fleming, 3 may 1924 - 3 may 1997
Today would have been my mother’s 88th
birthday. It’s also the 15th
anniversary of her death.
Born in the 1920s in Newcastle upon Tyne,
my mother moved south with her parents and some of her siblings during the war
years of the 1940s – she was the youngest of seven children.
Although she left school aged just 14, my
mother always seemed intellectually very accomplished and was a big believer in
education. Some of my earliest memories are of her teaching me to read. She had cut out small squares of card
and hand-written letters on them; we would sit and make words by putting them
together.
![]() |
| 1966: yes, that's me. And yes, I still like ice cream. |
I suspect she knew she could have achieved
more in her own right.
When the end came for my mother, it came in the form of cancer of the oesophagus, which over the course of many, many months whittled away at her until there was almost nothing left. It was an ugly and unpleasant end.
When the end came for my mother, it came in the form of cancer of the oesophagus, which over the course of many, many months whittled away at her until there was almost nothing left. It was an ugly and unpleasant end.
She died before my sons were born. But I know
she would have adored them.
Friday, 27 April 2012
breaking news: sorry twitter, journalism still wins out
Two things happened in London in the space
of 24 hours that, once again, had me – and plenty of others – musing on the
role of Twitter as a channel for breaking news.
On Thursday 26 April, there was an incident
on the Bakerloo line of the London Underground (that’s the brown one).
I learned about it first thanks to twitter.
But here’s what I learned. I learned that something had happened – it might
have been a tube train crash, or a collapsed tunnel, or a train might have hit
a bulge in the wall of a tunnel, or the tunnel might be flooded, or some
plasterwork might have fallen off the tunnel walls onto the track, or there
might have been a terrorist attack.
My, what a lot of things I learned from Twitter that morning.
I looked online at some reputable news
providers’ websites to see what I might learn from them. It took a while for the news to appear
on the likes of the BBC or the Evening Standard websites. As is right and
proper.
On Friday 27 April, news broke on Twitter
that there had been a bomb scare on Tottenham Court Road (a very busy shopping
street, complete with a major theatre, lots of offices, pubs, restaurants etc,
and a tube station that was featured in An American Werewolf in London). There
were pics too.
Someone observed that the bomb scare (which
during the time I was writing this piece morphed into a hostage situation) had
been trending on Twitter for half an hour, but still no mention on the
mainstream news sites…. prompting one person to ask “do we need 24hr news channels anymore?” (@mattaudley)
But I like this tweet best: “What the hell
is going on at #tcr?!?
The bazillion varied reports are bloody confusing!” (@/betti_ttt)
The story was still developing while I was writing, but this is the BBC's take on it. And as of the time I published this piece, there were no reports of injuries - I can only hope that stays the case.
Responsible journalism demands that stories
are confirmed ("stood up" in the vernacular). That you have more than one source
to corroborate the lead or rumour, and that you explore the facts. At its heart
the job of the journalist is to find out what is actually going on and present
people with reliable facts*. Otherwise news is nothing more than a lot of
rumour and speculation.
There is (and will always be) a role for traditional
journalism and regular news outlets – it’s in cutting through the confusion and
presenting people with the facts.
That’s something Twitter will never be able
to do, because even if one tweet gets immediately to the heart of the matter,
the next 50 might offer nothing but fear, uncertainty and doubt. And how on
earth is one to tell the difference.
* footnote: anyone who tells you journalism
is all about getting to "the truth" is either a self-aggrandising liar, or a
fool.
Labels:
#tcr,
journalism,
news,
twitter
Saturday, 31 March 2012
i live in a country populated by idiots and run by buffoons
Last year parts of the UK were blighted by riots and looting.
Last week the more feeble-minded of the country's car-driving population started panic-buying petrol and diesel. This was sparked by concerns over a possible strike by lorry drivers, and was exacerbated by remarks made by Francis Maude - a government minister - who advised people should stock up on fuel for their cars. This was stupid and dangerous advice, driven by an idealogical desire to thwart the impact of a potential fuel strike.
Our less-than-impressive Prime Minister, David Cameron, echoed these sentiments.
What happened next was an explosion of the same attitudes and outlook we witnessed in last August's wave of arson and theft - a complete breakdown of perspective and an overwhelming sense of utter selfishness. I'm all right Jack is the attitude du jour.
To begin with there was fear over a shortage of fuel at the pumps over the Easter weekend, brought on by striking tanker drivers. But it soon began to sink in to these fretful idiots, many of whom had queued for hours at petrol stations to fill their cars and their many portable containers, that there would not be a strike-prompted shortage of fuel over Easter. After all, no strike had been called. Added to which, in the event a strike is called, seven days notice would be given prior to the actual strike.
On Thursday 29 March, sales of petrol and diesel were up 172%.
The queuing and panicky behaviour extended into Friday, with long queues, petrol stations running out, tempers fraying and people generally carrying on like confused, frighted children.
Why continue to panic-buy fuel when there is no impending problem?
Perhaps because if you don't go and buy as much as you can there won't be any left when you need it, because other people will have bought it all.
In the wake of last August's riots, David Cameron said: "For me, the root cause of this mindless selfishness is the same thing that I have spoken about for years."
He was right and his home-spun truism works well here too.
Back then I wrote:
He went on, as politicians often do: “It is a complete lack of responsibility in parts of our society. People allowed to feel that the world owes them something, that their rights outweigh their responsibilities and that their actions do not have consequences.”
You can read the full post here.
All of this has left me more convinced than ever that there is a bitter streak of unpleasantness that runs through people in this country. We do not stand together. We squabble and complain. We are mistrustful of others. We put our own short-term wants and needs ahead of everything.
The UK gets more like a Lord of the Flies LARP with each passing year.
Last week the more feeble-minded of the country's car-driving population started panic-buying petrol and diesel. This was sparked by concerns over a possible strike by lorry drivers, and was exacerbated by remarks made by Francis Maude - a government minister - who advised people should stock up on fuel for their cars. This was stupid and dangerous advice, driven by an idealogical desire to thwart the impact of a potential fuel strike.
Our less-than-impressive Prime Minister, David Cameron, echoed these sentiments.
What happened next was an explosion of the same attitudes and outlook we witnessed in last August's wave of arson and theft - a complete breakdown of perspective and an overwhelming sense of utter selfishness. I'm all right Jack is the attitude du jour.
To begin with there was fear over a shortage of fuel at the pumps over the Easter weekend, brought on by striking tanker drivers. But it soon began to sink in to these fretful idiots, many of whom had queued for hours at petrol stations to fill their cars and their many portable containers, that there would not be a strike-prompted shortage of fuel over Easter. After all, no strike had been called. Added to which, in the event a strike is called, seven days notice would be given prior to the actual strike.
On Thursday 29 March, sales of petrol and diesel were up 172%.
The queuing and panicky behaviour extended into Friday, with long queues, petrol stations running out, tempers fraying and people generally carrying on like confused, frighted children.
Why continue to panic-buy fuel when there is no impending problem?
Perhaps because if you don't go and buy as much as you can there won't be any left when you need it, because other people will have bought it all.
In the wake of last August's riots, David Cameron said: "For me, the root cause of this mindless selfishness is the same thing that I have spoken about for years."
He was right and his home-spun truism works well here too.
Back then I wrote:
He went on, as politicians often do: “It is a complete lack of responsibility in parts of our society. People allowed to feel that the world owes them something, that their rights outweigh their responsibilities and that their actions do not have consequences.”
You can read the full post here.
All of this has left me more convinced than ever that there is a bitter streak of unpleasantness that runs through people in this country. We do not stand together. We squabble and complain. We are mistrustful of others. We put our own short-term wants and needs ahead of everything.
The UK gets more like a Lord of the Flies LARP with each passing year.
Labels:
fuel,
lord of the flies,
panic,
selfish
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

